Between Mitt Romney's selection of Rep. Paul Ryan as his running mate, his team of Dubya-rehash economic advisers (because that worked out so well) and Tea Party favorite Chris Christie as keynote speaker at this year's Republican National Convention, the Republican Party is in danger of doing something that seemed impossible just a few months ago: strengthening support among the liberal base of the Democratic Party for President Barack Obama.
Granted, disappointed lefties will not soon forget Obama's betrayals: Guantanamo, the drone wars against Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere and the fact that this tone-deaf president has yet to propose a jobs program.
But many progressives, until recently threatening to sit on their hands or cast votes for a third party, are reconsidering, weighing disgust against gathering terror as they read the signals from the gathering storm in Tampa, Fla. Where Obama fails to inspire enthusiasm, the Romney team seems determined to generate as much fear as possible that he plans to shove the needle even further to the radical right than Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush.
Romney, who abandoned his history as a centrist Massachusetts Republican and is running as a right-winger, chose to balance his newfound extremism with Ryan, an even-more-right-winger. Ryan is a vicious, overrated ideologue whose greatest achievement--his theoretical budget proposal--paints a picture of America as a dystopian hell where an infinitely funded Pentagon wages perpetual war and the top 1 percent of the top 1 percent party on tax cuts while the elderly and poor starve or succumb to treatable diseases, whichever kills them first. Lest you wonder whether the Ryan selection is an anomaly, wonder not--from Christie to the stump speeches to the men first in line to join a Romney cabinet, everything about Team Romney screams Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter and Ayn Rand minus the cool atheism and elitism.
If I were advising Romney, I would tell him that cozying up to the lunatic fringe of American pseudoconservatism is not a prescription for victory in November, when the outcome hinges upon seducing that 5 or 10 percent of voters who swing both ways. Ryan isn't as crazy (or bold) of a choice as Sarah Palin, but what Republicans don't understand is that conservatives will vote Republican regardless of who is the vice presidential running mate or, for that matter, who is the Republican nominee for president. Lack of enthusiasm among the base wasn't Romney's big problem, it was Obama's.
Romney's biggest albatross is that he's a terrible candidate, a guy who obviously doesn't like people. And his campaign sucks. The deficit may represent a looming existential threat--unemployment and the environment are more urgent--but "take your medicine" austerity isn't much of a sales pitch, especially when two-thirds of the people are already feeling squeezed. Voters reward candidates who present an optimistic vision, a future in which they see themselves richer, happier and with fuller, more lustrous hair.
The fact that Romney can't manage to put forward a credible economic program doesn't help either. Since his entire campaign is predicated on the argument that he's the economy guy and knows how to fix it, he needs to cough up a plan.
However, my real concern is that Romney's gangbusters right-wing extremism lets Obama and the Democrats off the hook.
If all Democratic strategists have to do to attract progressive voters is to frighten them with greater-evil Republicans, when will people who care about the working class, who oppose wars of choice and whose critique of government is that it isn't in our lives enough ever see their dreams become party platform planks, with some chance of being incorporated into legislation?
In recent elections (c.f. Palin and some old guy vs. Obama), liberals are only voting for Democrats out of terror that things will get even worse. That's no way to run a party or a country.